Socio-economic Review of Community
Fisheries
MegaPesca Lda, Portugal
REFRIGERATED
TRANSPORT OF FROZEN TUNA
1. Introduction
Tuna is a global commodity and there are three main distribution channels
from the fishery to the cannery.
The seasonal and migratory nature of fishery
means that even if canneries are located close to fisheries
(eg. in the Indian Ocean region) they may still need to import frozen fish from
other producing regions at some times.
As a result raw material for canneries is frequently transported long distances
by sea, from the fishing grounds to the main processing regions. Some of the
main transport routes are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Main sea trade routes for frozen tuna
Main catching regions | Main processing regions |
Indian Ocean | Thailand |
SW Pacific | W.Africa |
W.Africa | S and Central Aerica |
Central and S.America (Pacific) | Europe |
2. Quality implications
of reefer transport
Reefer transport of tuna has several quality implications:
3. Claims for damaged
cargo
Most operators are aware that tuna can arrive
in poor condition after a long journey by sea in a reefer vessel. When a cargo
is seen to be in poor condition, the immediate reaction is to blame the
transport conditions ie. the reefer vessel.
Since 1990 consultants from MegaPesca and our associated company MacAlister
Elliott and Partners have attended 10 claims involving damaged cargoes of frozen
tuna. We therefore have developed a body of experience about what can go wrong.
The claims are summarised in Table 2.
All but one claim involved reports of distortion,
and fish sticking together necessitating the use of crow bars for discharge,
with or without some evidence of recommencement of spoilage. Many claims
referred to "splits, smashed or mutilated fish", and the US Tuna
Foundation Protocol (being a common industry standard for sampling and testing
of batches of raw fish). "Splits smashed or mutilated fish" are
defined in this protocol as having damage covering more than > 10% of the
surface area of the usable portion of the fish in selected lot¹.
Only one claim involved taint, and was due to contamination with liquid fuel
oil. None of the claimed cargo damage was due to excessive dehydration.
¹A lot is defined by vessel, trip, well and species and has maximum size of 100
tonnes; sample size should be a minimum of 2 fish per box (or 1 fish if over
20lb in weight).
Table 2: Principle causes of damage in claims for damaged tuna cargo
Year | From | To | Size/Value of claim |
Problem | Cause | Other factors |
1999 | Manta | Bangkok | n/a | Elevated temperatures during loading |
High temperatures in fishing vessel |
Poor hatch seal |
1998 | Kiribati | Songhla | 139 | Distortion, spoilage | High loading temperature | Wet product from brine tanks. Inefficient, old refrigeration plant |
1998 | Walvis Bay | American Samoa | 90 tonnes | High loading temperature |
||
1997 | Ensenada | Monteverde | 352 tonnes $267 |
Distortion/spoilage | High loading temperature |
Poor quality pre-freezing |
1995 | Abidjan | Turkey | 885 tonnes | Distortion/spoilage | High temperatures in fishing vessel |
Slow transhipment; faulty hatch seal |
1995 | Seychelles | Vigo | 150 tonnes | Distortion | High loading temperature | |
1994 | Abidjan | Vigo | 48 tonnes | Distortion, broken | Not established | |
1994 | Samoa | Puerto Rico/Vigo | Distortion | High loading temperature |
Poor handling before freezing | |
1993 | Ensenada | Villa Garcia | 76 | Distortion, spoilage | High loading temperature |
Slow transhipment mixing of small and large fish |
1990 | Venezuela | Vigo | 74 | Distortion, broken | High loading temperature |
Poor stowage (large and small fish) Poor transport to the vessel (open vehicles) |
Detailed investigation on the spot, and study of
documentation and vessel records was undertaken in each case. Refrigeration
breakdowns are not a common feature, and in fact only in one case was a
refrigeration defect implicated, and then in combination with other causes. Two
cases involved some damage arising from faulty hatch seals. However, in almost
all of the cases, the principal cause of damage was higher than ideal
temperature at loading.
There are a number of unique features of the tuna fishing business which
contribute to higher temperatures at loading of the reefer vessel, when compared
with other fishery products. It is useful to consider these features in more
detail.
4. Tuna fishing vessels
4.1 Tuna physiology
Tunas are well known for their higher proportion of lateral dark muscle, which
is physiologically designed for continuous movement. Tunas are also unique in
that their vascular system is designed as a counter-current heat exchanger (rete
mirabile), to maintain the temperature within the muscle at about 3°C above
ambient temperature in the case of yellowfin tuna, or up to 7°C in the case of
skipjack; this maintains muscle efficiency, increasing speed and endurance. Red
muscle in tunas is located internally, to further conserve heat.
Muscle glycogen provides an energy store. Post-mortem glycolysis uses this store
after the fish is caught to provide contraction of the muscle, exhibited as
rigor mortis. This is also associated with heat production. Given the depth of
the red muscle, its elevated temperature to start with and the loss of blood
circulation as a cooling medium, the internal temperature can rise to the extent
of causing a partial denaturing of the muscle protein. In tuna, more than most
fish, there is therefore a need for rapid chilling after the catch is brought
onboard. The use of refrigerated seawater (RSW) and brine freezing provides the
rapid heat transfer needed to cool the fish quickly.
4.2 Brine freezing practices
Brine freezing is used for large fish to be frozen whole such as salmon and
tuna. The technique is used extensively on board tuna fishing vessels. The
fishing vessel is fitted with one or more insulated tanks containing
refrigeration coils. Brine freezing practices vary depending on the type of
vessel, size of tank and catch rate. The following describes a typical practice.
Before fishing starts, brine tanks are filled with seawater, which is then
cooled to around -1oC. As fish are caught, they are dropped or flumed into the
tanks, where they are chilled and held at this reduced temperature. When a tank
is full, the RSW is pumped out and refrigerated brine is pumped in, and the
temperature is lowered so that the fish freeze. Alternatively, if the catch rate
is high enough, the fish may be put directly into refrigerated brine.
The final temperature that can be achieved depends on the concentration of the
brine - the minimum, when the brine is saturated, is about -21oC. Figure 1 shows
the effect of brine strength on freezing temperature of the brine. In practice,
brine temperatures can be anywhere in the range - 9.5 to -17°C, depending on
the fishing vessel practice.
Bear in mind that the engineer will not operate the brine at its freezing point
(otherwise an ice slush forms which cannot easily be pumped) but will need a
margin of a few degrees. Therefore to freeze at say -12°C, will need an 18 or
19% brine (with a freezing point at -15°C). As a result brine freezing of fish
results in the final temperature at the end of freezing being much higher than
the ideal.
4.3 Storage on board
Once the fish are frozen, they may be held in the refrigerated brine, or the
brine may be drained from the tank and the fish held in dry condition with the
refrigeration system on. This avoids the fish absorbing too much salt and drying
of the wells is recommended when the storage period is longer. After drying the
well, the temperature of the fish will fall slowly to achieve an equilibrium.
The equilibrium depends on the vessel refrigeration system and the level of
insulation of the well.
Typically the temperature will fall to an equilibrium of about -14°C over time,
as shown in Figure 2.
4.4 Unloading of the
fishing vessel
Re-brining (the re-introduction of brine to the
dry well) is usually practiced as part of unloading procedure, to melt
interstitial ice (to separate fish which become "welded" to each
other) and to achieve a uniform temperature distribution. Commonly the brine
will be at a temperature of -10.5 to -11.5°C, since lower temperatures require
a stronger brine, and will not melt the ice as quickly. "Floating off"
is a practice in which the uppermost fish separate from the mass and float to
the top. As a result of re-brining, temperatures of the fish can increase
slightly. In the example shown in Figure 3, re-brining results in a temperature
increase from -14° up to -11°C after only one day.
4.5 What can go wrong?
Although frozen fish should ideally be kept at -18°C
throughout, this is clearly not practicable in the case of brine frozen tuna.
Using existing technology, the very best that transhipment temperature which can
be achieved in normal practice appears to be about -14°C. As a result,
temperatures between -10°C and -12°C are frequently considered to be normal in
the industry.
However, there are two clear sets of circumstances in which product temperatures
may be higher than this.
When product is recently frozen (eg. just after drying off the tanks)
When the re-brining period is too long
Figure 4 shows a set of temperatures
measured at the moment of transhipment from one of the consignments which
subsequently sustained damage. The temperatures were taken by the vessel crew
during transhipment and noted on the Mates' Receipts. There is clear evidence
that this cargo is running into problems with temperatures approaching -8°C.
5.
Transhipment
Conditions of transhipment can also have a significant effect, by
compounding the elevated temperature at which the fish leaves the fishing
vessel.
5.1 Atmospheric conditions
Transhipment from fishing vessels into reefer vessel, often at takes place
at sea and given the location of tuna resources, takes place in potentially hot
climates. When considering climatic conditions, we should consider not only
temperature, but also humidity and the rate of air flow.
The heat transfer rate from warm air to frozen tuna is determined by the
equation:
Q = hA(Tf - Ts)
Where
Q | Rate of heat transfer |
h | Heat transfer coefficient is a parameter which reflects the nature of the fluid flow pattern near the surface |
A | Surface area of material |
Tf | Temperature of the air |
Ts | Temperature of the surface |
The heat transfer coefficient h is a function of density
of gas x velocity
viscosity
As a result humid, fast moving air will have a much greater warming effect on
the cargo than dry still air at the same temperature. Such conditions are common
in the tropics at sea.
5.2 Rate of transhipment
The rate of transhipment can also have a
significant effect. Here we have found that the critical factor is the number of
consecutive days on which loading of a hatch takes place before it is finally
closed and subject to continuous refrigeration. Most vessels pre-chill cargo
holds prior to loading (although there is no evidence that this has any
significant impact). Clearly refrigeration systems cannot be run during loading;
typically they are switched back on during breaks and overnight. Note that
Charter Party Agreements often have a clause specifying minimum transhipment
rates, but even where these are complied with, we have experienced cases of
cargo damage.
Figure 5 shows the temperature history of a hatch in which cargo damage was
sustained.
The graph shows 3 distinct stages:
Note how the period during which fish is
transhipped does not permit much opportunity for cooling of the cargo if the
hatch is to be opened at regular intervals. In addition some reefers have decks
which are " 'tween" decks, ie two deck levels served by the same
refrigeration delivery system. Slow transhipment can mean that cargo waits until
the deck above is also loaded, before it final receives continuous
refrigeration.
6. Causes of damage
Having shown how tuna cargo may be loaded into the reefer vessel at a
temperature above its ideal, it is now appropriate to consider how deformation
damage can occur given these circumstances.
6.1 Factors affecting deformation
6.1.1 Temperature
![]() |
Although fish typically contain 70-80% of water - the exact percentage depends on the species - the situation is more complicated than freezing water alone. Water in the fish tissues starts to freeze at about -1oC but at this point only a proportion of the water is converted to ice. At -18oC, the maximum temperature usually specified for carriage of frozen fish in reefers, around 90% of the water has turned to ice. It is very hard to deform frozen fish at this temperature and below except under extremely high pressure. If the product warms at all, some of the ice melts. The fish tissue holds an increasing proportion of liquid water and a decreasing proportion of ice as its temperature rises. At -10oC, approximately 84% of the water is present as ice, compared with the 90% at -18oC, 76% at -7oC, and 70% at -3oC. |
As the proportion of ice decreases, the fish
tissue, though still frozen, becomes softer and can be deformed by moderate
pressure. For example, it is possible to deform the surface of a product at -7oC
by pressing hard with the point of a pen, a temperature probe, or even a
thumbnail. At -3oC, 'frozen' fishery products are soft enough to deform and to
sag under their own weight. If the cargo in the hold of a reefer is stacked to a
height of 4 or 5 metres, as is often the case, there is sufficient pressure to
distort fish to some extent at -7oC, and to distort and compress fish
considerably at -5oC or higher. Bear in mind the pressures can be quite high at
the bottom of the stack.
Individually frozen fish can be severely indented where they lie across each
other, and tend to take up the shapes of the surfaces they are pressed against -
ridged floor plates or edges structures in the hold. In an extreme case, a stack
of fish can be compressed together into a solid mass, with almost no spaces
between the fish. Blocks of products are squeezed, flattened and distorted and
will extrude into gaps between cartons. They can also be indented by floor
plates or pallet boards.
As far as the author is aware, there is no record of any studies undertaken to
measure the effect of temperature on compressibility of frozen tuna (or of any
other species of fish), and this is quite a remarkable omission given the value
of product which is transported under less than ideal conditions.
Other factors may also have an impact on this process.
6.1.2 Freezing point depression
Salt in the muscle also has the effect of reducing
the freezing point. Slow freezing in brine solutions results in an increase in
salt content, which may rise up to 2.0-2.5% if held for too long, as shown in
Figure 6.
It should also be noted that the key factor in freezing point depression is the
salt concentration in the aqueous phase of the flesh, rather than salt content
in the whole fish. Considering that, as a general rule of proximate composition
of fish muscle, fat plus water combined provide about 78-80% of the weight, then
more fat will mean less water. Tunas may have a high fat content (up to 10% is
not uncommon), and in such cases then effect of salt content is also greater in
terms of freezing point depression. Fish at 2% salt content and 10% fat will
have a salt concentration of just under 3% in the aqueous phase, and a freezing
point of just above -2.0°C. At -8°C such a product will have a much softer
texture, and be more susceptible to pressure damage than fish which has not been
brined at all.
6.1.3 Loss of air flow
The loss of flow of refrigerated air through cargo
is also implicated in the damage which is observed. Air flow to the cargo can be
restricted by mixing small and large fish, or by movement of the cargo due to a
temperature excursion. The latter is a crucial factor in the occurrence of the
typical damage seen in the majority of the cases reported in Table 2. Once the
cargo starts to compress, the gaps between the individual fish become smaller
and air flow is restricted further to the parts of the cargo which need it the
most. Even if the refrigeration system is working to its full extent, the flow
of chilled air to warmest parts of the cargo will be restricted, and there will
be no opportunity for heat transfer.
Clear evidence of this is shown in Figure 5, in which the cargo temperature was
clearly above 8°C for a sustained period, with no evidence at all demonstrated
from the delivery and return temperatures of the hatch. In fact unless a pulp
temperature probe is located in the damaged portion itself, the first sign of
damage will be during discharge.
6.1.4 Reefer design
Vessel refrigeration systems are designed to carry
frozen food, and to compensate for heat gains through the structure. They are
not designed to reduce the temperature of the cargo. Although most reefers do
have some spare capacity to lower the temperature of products which are put into
the hold at above ideal temperature, this cannot be relied on. There is no
reason why reefers should be expected to do more than they are designed or
contracted to do. Material that is above the operating temperature of the hold
will take a long time to cool down and will lose quality as a result.
Put all of the above factors together, and it is
perhaps remarkable that losses in reefer transport of frozen tuna are not much
greater. However it should be noted that we are not the only company involved in
this business, and that consultants are only called in when claims are large
enough to justify the cost.
Undoubtedly the problems described occur more frequently the average of
once/year. There are number of short-term and long-term recommendations which
could be implemented to reduce the risk of damage.
7. Recommendations
7.1 Short-term
7.1.1 Improved practices on fishing vessels
Brine freezing practices on board fishing vessels are perhaps at the root of
the damage, and this is where much can be done to avert the problem, by
observing that:
7.1.2 Improved transhipment procedures
7.1.3 Improved pre-shipment inspection
Receivers of damaged cargoes of frozen fishery
invariably allege that loss of quality occurred solely while the material was in
the charge of the reefer. However since it is rare that the reefer vessel is at
fault we would prefer to see a more active pre-shipment inspection, with the
master of the reefer vessel refusing to accept fish which does not meet the
temperature criteria. This will give a clear message to fishing vessel
operators. In our view, a simple pre-shipment inspection can be done by the
reefer crew, and could be a requirement of the Charter Party Agreement.
Pre-shipment inspection by the ship's officers is generally confined to visual
inspection of the cargo and to measurement of physical properties such as
temperature. Preshipment inspection should cover:
In the case of tuna, high temperatures on
loading, which is the main cause of quality problems during reefer transport,
could always be identified at loading if there was a more assiduous approach to
pre-shipment inspection. There should be sufficient temperature measurements
recorded against supplying vessel and if possible well number, and stowage
location in the hatch.
Information on the nature of the consignment and all details of labelling should
be recorded on the Mate's Receipt.
7.2 Long-term requirements
Good practice and current regulations require storage of frozen fishery
products at a temperature of -18°C or less at all times. In particular EU
Directive 91/493/EEC "Health conditions for the production and placing on
the market of fishery products" is quite specific on this point. Chapter IV
of the Annex to the Directive states that freezing of fish is required to
deliver product at -18°C, with the exception that it permits freezing to
temperatures of up to -9°C, in the case of brine frozen whole fish for canning.
Thus brine freezing is permissible. However, Chapter VIII of Annex goes on to
state that frozen fish must be stored at -18°C unless kept in brine, and
intended for canning. Therefore if the fish is not kept in brine, tuna must be
held at -18°C or below.
The present technology does not comply with the law, or any internationally
recognised codes of practice, EU or FDA regulations. Compliance is clearly not
feasible with present technological approach, since few fishing vessels appear
capable of delivering fish at -18°C to the reefer vessel. This is not an
acceptable situation. Industry should either comply, or if there is genuine
reason why it cannot, lobby for the legislation to be changed. Clearly in the
longer-term there is a requirement for changes to the technology used, to bring
practice into line with these requirements, and to reduce the risk of cargo
damage.
As experts we are often cross-examined on this point in court cases or
arbitration. It is quite clear that present practice is unlawful, and that
compliance is technically feasible. It should, in my opinion, therefore be a
long term objective to modify the technology used.
The options are:
In addition, it is proposed that there is a need
to modify the primitive methods used in the bulk transport of tuna cargoes to
more appropriate technologies. This could include introduction of onboard
packaging systems to offer greater protection to the product, and modification
of reefer vessel design to address the problem of racking systems to reduce the
occurrence of pressure damage. We should not rely on the frozen state to support
the weight of the cargo above.
Applied research is required to develop and assess the options which are
available.
Bibliography
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS
Tuna Handling and Refrigeration on Purse Seiners
Frank D Burns
US Department of Commerce
August 1985
US Tuna Foundation
Protocol for test packing of raw tuna
Acknowledgements
For supply of private data and photographs:
Mr.Peter Howgate
Mr.David Watson